Wednesday, 11 April 2007
David Holcombe kicks the morning off here at the Sheraton Boston announcing that attendance at the Annual Gathering is up 35% over last year.
Steve Wexler, the Guild’s new director of research comes on stage to demonstrate the Guild’s online interactive research tool. Scatter diagrams. Ability to select samples. Steve gets people hungry by showing how to figure out the salary of, say, instructional designers working for small companies in Florida. He mentions “if you’re bucking for a new job,” you can find the market rate for it. Then he shows satisfaction ratings for LMS. Blackboard users were more satisfied than Plateau users and less satisfied than Moodlers.
Clearly, the Guild has targeted research as a core effort and money-maker. Bump your membership fee by about $500 and you get increased access to the research tools. Also, you can buy research reports for an extra fee.
Convergence Culture, Henry Jenkins, MIT
Comparative Media Studies Program
Says he has gone from being seen as an entertainer to being taken seriously. People are taking media in their own hands. Media companies are concerned about losing control over their IP. The truth is that they lost control long ago. It’s true in learning as well: you don’t control the learner. See http://henryjenkins.org
American Idol. A phenom! Henry points out product placement – screen shot of Paula Abdul with prominent glass of Coca-Cola. More votes for American Idol than in the last presidential election. Also web, global reach, visible feedback. Howard Stern crosses media line. Old and new media meet one another in convergence culture.
We now live in a world where every story, image, sound, idea, brand, and relationship will play itself out across all possible media platforms. Collective intelligence.
“Members of a thinking community search, inscribe, connect, consult, explore . . . not only does the cosmopedia make available to the collective intellect all of the pertinent knowledge available to it at a given moment….” Pierre Levy See http://worldwithoutoil.org
We are seeing the emergence of a new form of participatory culture as consumers take media in their own hands, reworking its content to serve their own interests. Participation is a property of cultures. Interactivity is a property of technologies.
Participatory culture. Low barriers to astistic expression and civic engagement. Informal mentorship. Social connection between members. Strong support to for creating new media.
The Wealth of Networks. Difficult book but worth reading.
We are acquiring skills now through our play, including our game play, which we will later apply towards more serious ends. (Henry and I are on exactly the same page on this stuff.)
10,000 anonymous Chinese meet in Second Life to protest against the government.
The spectacles we create will not cover over or replace reality and truth but perform and amplify them…
Swiftboating is on the way.
Check out New London Group, A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies. If it were possible define generally the mission of education…. Learning is about participation. Think about Spelling Bee (punative) and Scrabble (positive).
Learning through remixing. How are we learning about culture, history, etc (Ties in to the each one/teach one aspect of informal learning. “We’re all in this together, man.”)
http://Projectnml.org – new media learning, funded by MacArthur Foundation. Learning through making media.
Funnily enough, Henry is talking at us about participation. He’s not eating his own dogfood here.
Talking about a “new informal curriculum.”
MySpace is banned from anything Federally funded. (even though kids are more likely to be molested in their Boy Scout troop than online)
Henry and I talked briefly after his presentation. His take on culture dovetails with my vision of where corporate learning culture must go. One aspect I hadn’t considered: workers learning by creating mash-ups of official policies and practices.


Flickr/jaycross
Facebook/Jay Cross
Linkedin/jaycross
Twitter/jaycross
YouTube/jakeross1
Del.icio.us/jaycross






5 comments ↓
Jay,
I would dearly love to know more about the eLearning Guild Annual Gathering for 2008. I would be grateful for whatever information or contacts you could provide.
Cathy
[...] 如果你昨天不能获取这个音频文件,那么现在它可以连接上了。这是我在旅途中所用Mac电脑的另一份制品–谁曾想过Fetch(傻瓜命名的FTP客户端)可以不需要连接许可上传文件?我可以阅读邮件但出于某种原因这台Mac电脑不能让我发送任何邮件。同时我发现这台Mac电脑不支持我的iRiver播放器。幸好我带了一台PC作为备份。一个小插曲,我摔碎了iRiver的透明塑料托盘。哎哟!Jay Cross, Informal Learning April 11, 2007 [原文链接] [标签: Gaming, Accessibility, Podcasting, Audio, United States] [ 参与评论] [...]
Jay,
Just want to clarify something you posted about research… you wrote “Bump your membership fee by about $500 and you get increased access to the research tools.” You don’t have to pay $500 to get access to the research engine. EVERY level of Guild membership has access to the salary survey data and a number of other general reports/data using the research engine. What varies by membership level is access to the multi-dimensional data for specific reports. We have always tried to give as much as possible to all members of the Guild.. including the free Associate level.
Also, EVERY member gets access to the research report summaries (about an 80 page report) for free… they do have to pay to get the Full 300+ page reports and/or access to the live data that supports the full report.
With the launch of the live, interactive research engine, we have increased the amount of data all levels of membership has to Guild research compared to what they previously recieved.
Just want to set the record straight…
Thanks for the clarification, Heidi. Steve Wexler and I just swapped email about getting together so I can understand the tool (and its pricing) better. Some of the participants who heard Steve at the Annual Gathering were really, really jazzed, so I’m looking forward to learning more.
Great conference!
[...] Ok, the title’s a little broader-reaching than the post will be, but it’s some thinking that was prompted by Henry Jenkin’s presentation at the eLearning Guild conference, which Jay Cross has covered. The one new point I took away was the implications of “rip, mix, burn” for eLearning. What will learners do in the new read/write environment? [...]
Leave a Comment